Discover what we're passionate about, our stories, and our expertise. Get inspired by our FREDS Blog!

In short: Phase change materials (PCMs) give lightweight buildings the heat-buffering behaviour of heavy thermal mass without the weight, absorbing heat as they melt and releasing it as they re-solidify. Their real-world benefit hinges on climate, placement and a cool enough night to reset which is why dynamic thermal simulation, not a product datasheet, is the only reliable test.

In short: UK buildings are designed against historical weather, but they will operate into the 2070s in a climate the record does not yet contain. Research projects heating demand falling up to 21% by 2080 while cooling demand rises sharply making climate resilient building design a present-day requirement, not a future one (Viganò et al., 2024).

In short: A net-zero building certified today is judged against today’s weather but it will operate into the 2080s. When researchers stress-tested a UK net-zero home against 2080 climate files, it held: no significant overheating in any scenario and roughly 89% lower emissions than a conventional design, albeit with the necessity of a cooling system. The resilience was a finding, not a guarantee of the label which is what net zero building design software must be able to verify (Viganò et al., 2024).

In short: Thermal comfort simulation models how a space actually feels air and radiant temperature together, not just how much energy it uses. In a listed Victorian hall, it showed infrared panels were the simplest heritage-friendly retrofit, but heat pumps delivered far lower carbon and running cost over the building’s life. Only a holistic appraisal surfaces that trade-off (Rugani, Picco and Fantozzi, 2024).

In short: The best building energy simulation software is not a single product, it is the right class of tool for your design stage, on a validated engine, with a published benchmark. Detailed environments (DesignBuilder, IES VE) suit technical design; cloud screening tools (FREDS, benchmarked within 20% on heating and cooling against a detailed EnergyPlus model) suit concept stage; compliance calculators suit certification (Picco and Marengo, 2019).

In short: U-value measures steady-state heat loss; it says nothing about how a wall behaves over a day. Dynamic thermal modelling captures what it misses and shows that in warm climates a high-thermal-mass envelope can deliver 12% fewer discomfort hours and 5% lower cooling demand than a lightweight wall of the same U-value (Rugani et al., 2021).